Clinton’s Revenge on Obama?

October 16, 2012 at 5:00 am / by

About Barbara Cook

Florida PolitiChick Barbara J. Cook (Cookie) is a bodacious, creative conservative desiring to promote conservatism in sunny Florida, and beyond! Run with me into the future on and check… More

Clinton and Obama, best buds or arch rivals?  It would appear that they both have dirt on each other and at any given moment that dirt could be spilled.

During the Vice Presidential debate, the topic of the attack on the Libyan embassy came up.  Biden responded (or rather interrupted) Ryan with the retort, “We weren’t told they wanted more security.”

Hmm, seems to me I have read various reports that state otherwise, plus, wouldn’t one think that the Commander in Chief would have privy to that type of information?

Who is in charge of the State Department?  Hillary Clinton.

Who does it appear the WH is trying to put the blame on? Hillary Clinton.

At a press conference on Friday, October 12th, White House spokesman Jay Carney informed the press that the White House “knew nothing about the attack” and that the State Department was responsible for security measures made (or not made) regarding the Libyan Consulate.

There are multiple reports that Bill Clinton is somewhat miffed (to put it mildly) that Obama would place the blame solely on Hillary, and he is consulting various sources in order to keep Hillary’s record clean.  The reports state that the former president is seeking legal advice about what to do with the emails and other recorded conversations pertaining to the attack and security.  Shredding documents perhaps??

Funny, but wasn’t George W. Bush blamed for EVERYTHING that took place during his presidency?  Double standards, par for the course…

Reportedly Hillary and Barack have been at odds with each other since the 2008 presidential campaign when Hilary said Obama was not eligible to be president.  The Clinton’s were the first to question Obama’s place of birth and it is reported that producer Bettino Viviano (VP at Amblin Entertainment) overheard Bill Clinton commenting about Obama’s eligibility to be president pertaining to not having the proper birth documents.  Clinton stated he would “go public with the information when the time was right.”

Another interesting news item happened when Bill Gwatney, head of the Democratic Party in Arkansas and a close friend of Bill’s, was fatally shot in his office two weeks prior to the Democratic convention of 2008.

A report in WND stated that Bill was told he would be next “if he didn’t stop the birther issue.”  Understandably the Clintons were shocked and upset at the loss of their friend; however, they were not concerned until a staffer who worked for Hillary told Viviano that “Chelsea was going to be next on the list to die” if the Clinton’s didn’t drop the birth certificate issue.

Making sense now?

So let’s move forward to when Hillary made a surprise visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office in the summer of 2009, just prior to her visit to Africa.  Until that time, there was reportedly a copy of Obama’s birth certificate there as public information.  There are several links on the web with the same information – the public recorded birth of Obama as a Kenyan was recorded in Britain until the exact same time as Hillary’s visit.  Recall that up until December 1963 Kenya was part of the British Commonwealth, hence the reason for Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate recorded there.

Where am I going with this?  If Obama is shifting the blame of the Libyan attack onto Hillary Clinton, there could be hell to pay and it will be interesting to see how it plays out just before the election.  “October Surprise” could well be an interesting surprise!

Last, attached is an article in which the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National Committee “assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.”  In other words, according to the DNC it doesn’t matter what it says in the Constitution about silly things like “eligibility”—the choice of president should lie solely in the hands of the DNC…

Like this article? Share it!    Share on Facebook623Tweet about this on Twitter0Google+0Email to someonePrint this page


Barbara Cook

Florida PolitiChick Barbara J. Cook (Cookie) is a bodacious, creative conservative desiring to promote conservatism in sunny Florida, and beyond! Run with me into the future on and check some tantalizing recipes out on and just because you can,

Read all posts by Barbara Cook
Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.


  1. carnastar777 says:

    Waiting, waiting, waiting for all of it to make national news….I think you can only push the Clintons just so far and they will let it all come out in the wash-while the Clintons appear to support socialist types of policies, I believe they are Americans in their hearts-Obama is not.
    If the Clintons blow the whistle, Obama will go to jail for treason as he should. I can’t imagine anything this administration could offer the Clintons for Hillary to remain ok with taking the blame for Benghazi, effectively permanently ruining her reputation.

    • Middlemary says:

      Some kind of deal has been made!

    • Barbara Cook says:

      Very true, lies can only be covered up for so long. Late last night, Monday, I read that Hillary is now saying she is fully responsible for the Libyan attacks. Very curious as to what is going to happen next – guarantee the Clintons have the ace card to play at the right moment!

    • But if she takes the blame and stays quiet, she may keep her job for four more years; thus being able to stay away from Bill much longer! If she stays quiet, she keeps her job. She’ll have four more years to lose that thirty pounds, get the Life-Style Lift she so desperately deserves, and pick out a more “Presidential” wardrobe!

  2. countryboy67 says:

    If Obama wins then it will be another four years before anything is said and if Obama loses then it wont be until after the election…He and the democrats will protect his hinnie just like they always do with lies….

  3. Don says:

    If all of this is true, then I wish the Clintons would finally man-up and release the info, that Obama was never eligible, that most people with any commonsense know is true, and take down Obama for good. Stop being cowards. Be patriots!

  4. 67primrose says:

    Wouldn’t it be hilarious if the Clintons, just a few days before the election reveal that Obama is a fraud…LOL Love it.

  5. Donna Casas says:

    That’s all news to me. Interesting.

  6. Irma says:

    How chicken-shit Obama is to hide behind a woman – even if it is Hillary.

  7. Bob Marshall says:

    It is amazing how little most citizens seem to know about the Clintons.

  8. Brilliantly researched and speculative article! Gosh, Barbara, you’ve got the brains to vote with, not just your female parts!

Leave a Comment


— required *

— required *