Security for Benghazi: Funding Was NOT the Issue

June 3, 2013 at 5:00 am / by

About Maureen Mullins

California PolitiChick Maureen Mullins was born in March 1963 and if ever asked the proverbial “Where were you when JFK was shot?” she may confidently reply, “In my playpen.” Her first true recollection of poli… More

The last few weeks I have noted several pieces in the social media on Facebook, Twitter, some in the punditry on the left who are attempting to claim the reason security was not as it should have been in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 was due to “Republican budget cuts”. Those who promulgate this false narrative obviously do not comprehend how federal government spending is done.

First of all, the Republicans have a majority in only one half of the two branches of the federal system required, they can no more impose their will upon the country than could a pro-life president disallow legal abortions.  But that is another discussion for another day.  There are simply not enough Republicans, especially fiscal conservative Republicans, to get decreases in federal spending accomplished.

Second, there has not been a fiscal budget blueprint passed and enacted for several years now. This country has been operating via Continuing Resolution, the spending levels for the fiscal year; the legislation has been passed by a Republican-majority House, a Democratic-majority Senate and then enacted with the signature of a Democratic president.  All three must accept whatever blame/consequences occur due to those spending levels.

Third, there are no cuts, no minuses; each and every year spending on the various departments and programs of the federal government has increased. This is why the United States is closing in on $17 trillion as the National Debt figure, (it is closer to $90 trillion when you include all the unfunded liability for the country).  With all the protestations of “massive cuts” and “slash and burn”, curiously no one ever seems to notice the debt continues to increase every year.

Fourth, once money has been authorized and appropriated by Congress and sent on to the departments, “the checks cut” they have nothing more to do with it.  Each department will have its bean-counters work up their pay schedules, from pens, pencils, coffee and donuts in the office to the salaries of all those who work there, the accounting sheets will go through the different levels all the way up to the head of the department for signature, approval – in this case, the Secretary of State at the time, Hillary Clinton.

Finally, and most importantly, in her testimony to the House Government Operations committee last fall, State Dept. Deputy Assistant Director Charlene Lamb replied under oath to direct question that funding played no role in the security, or lack thereof, that night of the assault on the compound.

Funding for providing enough security in such a dangerous an area of the world was not at issue, so then why all the chatter to the contrary lately?  Methinks they doth protest too much.

Like this article? Share it!    Share on Facebook287Tweet about this on Twitter0Google+3Email to someonePrint this page


Maureen Mullins

California PolitiChick Maureen Mullins was born in March 1963 and if ever asked the proverbial “Where were you when JFK was shot?” she may confidently reply, “In my playpen.” Her first true recollection of politics was when the usual after school re-runs of “Gilligan’s Island” and “Hogan’s Heroes” were being pre-empted by the Watergate hearings. This carried through to her discovery of CSPAN, when in doing research for an essay on Abscam for her high school government class, she heard Newt Gingrich giving Special Orders speeches on the subject from the well of the House of Representatives. Her first foray into political activity was to volunteer for the Reagan For President campaign in 1980, as she was only 17 that November and would not be able to cast a vote for him until 1984. She has subsequently done volunteer work on various House and presidential campaigns throughout the years. A dedicated Constitutionalist, one of Maureen’s greatest honors was to be a charter member of Hillary Clinton’s “Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy” and continues to this day to help the people of this country recognize and remember the value of true liberty.

Read all posts by Maureen Mullins
Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.


  1. Mizflame98 says:

    Fantastic. Love the article. This is something that has been driving me nuts since Obama tried to blame everyone else for the Sequestration that he suggested. Glad you are there to say what needs to be said.

  2. Sleeping Bear says:

    A long that line then, that’s why the marines in Afganistan are not getting hot meals. Because John Kerry says they don’t need hot meals. Sounds like the problem is really getting fixed. We go from not providing security to our embassy to no hot meal.
    Great article. Thank you

  3. dominke says:

    Obama and Hilary are bed mates. They both are out to destroy our country and make us 3rd world entity. Why both are liked so much is just crazy. Many people who call themselves Americans are just flat our liars. These people believe if Obama and Clinton’s have total control they will be favorite to keep receiving entitlements. They are wrong as they will be just like everyone who opposed them. These people need to look at blueprint Hitler had and see how much alike they are.

  4. babsan says:

    Another great article by Maureen Mullins.Should be read by ALL Americans .Unfortunately most are too lazy,stupid and brain washed by the Commie/Liberal schools

  5. MargaretJacobson says:

    I still feel that ambassador Stevens knew too much ?? He had to be silenced ?? What better way than give no assistance for a call of help !! Problem solved !!

Leave a Comment


— required *

— required *