Thanks to Whistleblowers, the Benghazi Trials Begin!

May 7, 2013 at 5:00 am / by

About Katie Abercrombie

Florida PolitiChick Katie Abercrombie, native of North Carolina and a long-time resident in Florida, is a 20-year homeschooling veteran. Now that her four children are grown, she continues to indulge… More

Someone is very nervous about the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s upcoming Benghazi hearings. For months we heard nothing about the survivors of the 9/11 attacks on our consulate in Benghazi. No personal experiences, no details about the wounded, nothing. It was like they did not exist.

Then, in recent weeks, we started hearing about whistleblowers – people within an organization who want to bring to light misdeeds within said organization – related to the Benghazi attacks. These folks, people within the State Department and the CIA, apparently, have a story to tell, and someone is not happy for them to tell it.

Now we have reports of witness intimidation. Victoria Toensing, an attorney for one of the Benghazi witnesses, claims that witnesses are facing pressure from the State Department as they prepare to testify this week before the House committee. While they have not been dealt direct threats, “administration officials have insinuated witnesses could lose their jobs or get passed up for promotions if they testify.”

On Sunday’s Monica Crowley radio show, Toensing also suggested that another classic reprisal technique could be used against the witnesses. Because their work is very sensitive security-wise, they could be called upon to renew their security clearances early. Usually done every five years, this rather arduous process delves into every aspect of a person’s life. If an early renewal process should just happen to find something negative, it could cause the unfortunate witness to be bumped down a couple of levels in his or her security clearance, making it difficult to continue in the same job or to take on new jobs.

President Obama stated on Wednesday, May 1, “I’m not familiar with this notion that anybody’s been blocked from testifying.” This, from the man who claimed the attack was a spontaneous reaction to an obscure anti-Islamic video.

White House press secretary Jay Carney, at a White House press briefing, said, “Benghazi happened a long time ago. We are unaware of any agency blocking an employee who would like to appear before Congress to provide information related to Benghazi.”

A long time ago? Really? How long did we talk about Watergate? Or Iran-Contra? The attacks in Benghazi happened less than eight months ago. People died, and it is very clear that our leaders at the highest levels have lied. (Remember the phrase “Bush lied. People died”? I think we heard about that for more than eight months.)

This has the potential to be much bigger than Watergate. The difference here is that we don’t have the pit bull media dogging the administration’s heels about it every moment. This is a Democrat administration after all. But people died, including our ambassador, Chris Stevens, and the American people need to know what happened and what role our leaders played in this travesty.

The question, of course, is who is putting the pressure on these witnesses? Who has the most to lose? President Obama most certainly would like to see this go away. My generation has seen one president step down to avoid impeachment and another impeached but not convicted. What happened in Benghazi appears be much more serious than either of those two crimes, especially with all the covering up and back tracking that seems to be going on. This could bring down his presidency, even without the help of the media.

My guess, however, is that it is not the current president that is most at risk. I think the person who stands to benefit the most by silencing the witnesses is Hillary Clinton, who almost certainly will be the Democratic nominee for president in 2016. The Benghazi attacks happened on her watch as Secretary of State, and what these witnesses reveal has the potential to make her look incompetent and even treasonous.

Hillary is no dummy. Always the politician, she resigned her post as Secretary of State early this year and has been distancing herself from the Benghazi attacks ever since. Her comment, “What difference, at this point, does it make?” has not gone away, however, and will haunt her in any future campaign.

So, two historical presidencies hang in the balance. Will Benghazi bring down our first black president? Will Hillary Clinton lose her chance to be our first female president? Yes, someone is very nervous. This week’s hearings will give us a good idea who that is. Pay attention, America!

Like this article? Share it!    Share on Facebook480Tweet about this on Twitter0Google+3Email to someonePrint this page


Katie Abercrombie

Florida PolitiChick Katie Abercrombie, native of North Carolina and a long-time resident in Florida, is a 20-year homeschooling veteran. Now that her four children are grown, she continues to indulge her love for teaching and learning by tutoring, substitute teaching, and teaching writing classes for homeschoolers. She earned her BS degree from Florida Southern College and her MA from Rollins College. BC, or Before Children, she served as the Director of Youth and Family Ministry at her church and has continued to be active in ministry and leadership in her current church. Homeschooling afforded her many opportunities to be politically active and she recently retired from a term on the Orange County Republican Executive Committee. Like “Katie’s Political Page” on Facebook and follow her on Twitter @aberaussie.

Read all posts by Katie Abercrombie
Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.


  1. Excellently written Katie! I’d venture to say both dear leader and hillary have much to worry about. Hill because she had final say as Sec. of State when it came to approving more security for the compound. It’s broad knowlege now that those who worked at the Benghazi compound were telling the State Dept. of Al Qaida and other terrorist activity as early as March 2010- and asked for more security as time went on. It was denied over and over again.
    Obama is the only one who can approve a Cross Border Authorization. It was never given. We know we had Special Ops teams and others waiting to go in, who had requested to go in- but they were told to stand down and the CBA never came. Dear leader must answer to this and other questions.
    I look forward to hearing testimony coming out of the hearings!

  2. Crossroads says:

    “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

    A fitting epitaph…

    • Learned Hand says:

      Now that’s what we need, a bumper sticker with that quote upon it and Hellaries(sic) name appended to it. And all of this lends much more credibility to the falsity of her statements and that story about her “concussion” and memory loss during her Senate testimony. She’s a liar of the highest order, schooled by Bill, who revelled in his lies before Congress.

  3. Breezeyguy says:

    Ha, every murderer could ask on the stand “what difference, at this point, could it make?”. The difference is JUSTICE. That’s the difference. But that hag cares nothing for justice.

  4. giley1 says:

    That statement made by Hillary Clinton, in essence “what difference does it make” says it all. Our servicemen and embassy/consulate workers are expendable. Hillary, however is special, and she and all those others that may be covering the thruth from being exposed in the Benghazi murders need to be made fully accountable.

Leave a Comment


— required *

— required *