The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Back up for Vote

May 27, 2013 at 5:00 am / by

About Carolyn Elkins

Carolyn Elkins' PolitiChicks articles have been shared by Mark Levin, NewsBusters and New Media Journal. She writes about everything from military issues, the Middle East, Islam, politics to the Founding… More

“Tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world.” – George Washington

The U.S. Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee has just announced that there will be a hearing on the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on June 4.

You may remember that this treaty failed to pass in the Senate already last year.  As with most things coming out of the UN and other world bodies, the language when read sounds good, but the ramifications are often not thought of.  Opponents of this treaty worried that this would give the U.N. oversight of the healthcare and education choices made by parents with special needs kids.  CRPD would become the law of the land under the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, and would override state laws, and would give the federal government, acting under U.N., the ability to determine for all children with disabilities what is best for them. It also would give the U.N. discretion over decisions about how we educate our special needs kids, and could potentially eliminate parental rights for the education of children with disabilities.

US Anti-Discrimination and Persons with Disabilities laws in this country already meet or exceed the standards that are set in the UN treaty, so in reality, this treaty would not have any effect on anyone in this country if it were to pass, except by way of having the UN and member nations dictating to US parents on what is in the best interest of their children.  This treaty has already been ratified by 126 nations, including China, Russia, Iran, Cuba, Syria and Saudi Arabia.  It would be laughable if not so serious when one takes an honest look at the human rights violations of some of the nations who have signed on this treaty.  How would the US ratifying this treaty help the disabled children in other nations?  In two words, it wouldn’t.

Last year, Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) came out against the treaty saying, “I will do everything I can to block its ratification, and I have secured the signatures of 36 Republican senators, all of whom have joined with me saying that we will oppose any ratification of any treaty during this lame-duck session.” As he and others had and still have concerns about this treaty’s threat to American sovereignty.

Rick and Karen Santorum worked hard to see this defeated last year.  They, the parents of a disabled little girl had a lot of concerns with the language spelled out in the articles in the treaty.

Then Sen. John Kerry, (D-Mass.), a strong proponent of the measure, said the treaty “just says that you can’t discriminate against the disabled. It says that other countries have to do what we did 22 years ago when we set the example for the world and passed the Americans with Disabilities Act.” Proponents of this treaty were quick to point out that it really requires nothing of the United States, only basically ordering the other signatories to update their laws so that they more closely match the Americans with Disabilities Act.  If this is the case, then why are the UN and progressives working so hard for the US to ratify it? Why did they try to vote last time during the lame duck session, and why, since it failed to pass are they working so hard to try again?

Progressives claim those of us who opposed it and still do as conspiracy theorists. The Guardian came out with a scathing, vitriolic article which painted anyone who was against this as America’s holy warriors and religious extremists with “international ambitions.”  I don’t see how we could be considered having international ambitions when it is not the Christian Conservatives who believe it takes a village to raise a child as we’ve heard progressives claim.  Because we see this treaty is a way to solidify that idea, and remove a parent’s rights in determining what is best for their own child does not make us extremist. It makes us aware that there is always a danger in signing away America’s sovereignty piece by piece when our own Constitution protects our Rights more than any other world body government would ever do.

You can find out who voted and how the last time here.  Please call and email your two U.S. senators and urge them to oppose the UN CRPD. The Capitol Hill Switchboard is 202-224-3121.

Like this article? Share it!    Share on Facebook76Tweet about this on Twitter0Google+4Email to someonePrint this page


Carolyn Elkins

Carolyn Elkins' PolitiChicks articles have been shared by Mark Levin, NewsBusters and New Media Journal. She writes about everything from military issues, the Middle East, Islam, politics to the Founding Fathers. Carolyn is a guest writer on The Right Scoop and PolitiBrew under the name American Duckie. Born in Canada, but now a proud U.S. citizen, Florida PolitiChick Carolyn is an unapologetic Christian and Constitutional Conservative. She studies the Founders and their writings, and uses what she learns to try and educate others. Carolyn is the founder of the Constitutional Freedom Party, a completely grass roots organization whose foundation is on God and the Founders’ intent for a Constitutional Republic. Carolyn is married with one child and has taught American Government and Constitution to her home school co-op group of 12- 14 year olds. You can visit her via the Constitutional Freedom Party blog or on twitter @ABiCduckie and @CFP4US

Read all posts by Carolyn Elkins
Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.


  1. Margie10 says:

    I have three autistic sons and I am literally terrified about this treaty passing. This is maddening! I can’t believe they even entertain the thought!

  2. 57thunderbird says:

    Very good article Carolyn.A must read,especially for parents of children with disabilities.

  3. NYGino says:

    Anytime we hitch our wagon to the laws and regulations of other countries or entities, specially the U.N., we give up a piece of our sovereignty. These proposals always come sugar coated, wrapped in brightly colored “humanistic” foil that is designed to have wide appeal on first blush but, as you so rightly point out Carolyn, a deeper look will reveal consequences either unforeseen or intentionally hidden.

    NAFTA anyone?

  4. marineh2ominer says:


  5. PuritanD71 says:

    Thanks Carolyn for the article. It is a must that we are vigilant. There is more danger that there is a provision in the treaty regarding corporal punishment not only of disabled children but on all children. There is much to dislike about this treaty and it affects all parents alike.

    It is why it must once again be defeated!

  6. brianjconway says:

    Carolyn. Nice article. we are the world leaders in caring for our disabled. we don’t need no stinkin UN interfering with our sovereignty.

Leave a Comment


— required *

— required *